Reputation
Reviews and Complaints

I feel your pain they did the same to me and my family. I'm on social media telling everyone what happened.

I was safer before using reputation.com.

I'm really sorry to read about what has happened to you and I can't Imagine how much you must paid for this bad service.

My family and I are exposed and afraid because we have been easily found by people looking for us. I'm at a lose and don't know what to do.

I agree with you. Bad Reputation in Beverly Hills are a bunch of *** artists.

We fixed the Sony ***... I can't tell you what they promised and didn't follow through. I paid $7,500. I asked for my money back and they are hiding out in their post office.

Post office address in Beverly Hills. Hersh is the President and Jeffrey is his side kick. DO NOT HIRE THEM.

THEY ARE TOXIC .. PROMISE THE WORLD AND DON"T CALL YOU BACK.

Go with Profile Defenders. They guarantee their work and actually get results. Reputation Defender is a waste.

After also suffering from reputation defender I hired profile defenders and they solved my issues. I want others to know since they asked for me to let others know and send referrals.

@Mike A Using press releases used to work well in the past but with Google's new algo that effect has been not been good. Getting content off he first page so the search engine results is darn hard now. This depends of course on the keywords involved. Populating the first page with various platforms takes time, knowledge and energy.

Ideally, you want all negative content on the 3rd or even 4th page rather the the first page. If some of the content on that first page has a high pagerank you are in for a hard time.

You can visit my website at http://www.onlinereputationpolice.com for more info or just email me at franko4444#gmail.com

I concur with the messages posted here concerning the company's editorial wing. It seems they have a reflexive defensive reaction telling you that your work is sub par when you disagree with them (in my case it was actually protesting that their editorial process was below standard, which I tried to do in a very diplomatic way, but which absolutely did not work).

People - both employees and those seeking their services - need to do their due diligence before getting involved.

I should have. The company was recently blacklisted by Google for their practices (reinstated late April), complaints are rampant on the web and upset employees seem to abound giving away company secrets because their positions were outsourced, etc. They apparently used to have another name, but changed it because of so many complaints and a lawsuit where they actually affected not only the complainant, but the victims as well. They seem to make their money on telemarketing sales focused on high end clients with deep pockets and something to hide who do not know how the internet works (what they do is known as link farming and content milling, mixed with gray to black hat SEO Google hacking).

The whole process seems to be a big wheel designed to maximize profit while they can with the online rep business while building a data mining vault of personal info. they plan to sell for future profit. Reading about this, and the fact that in all probability the company owns some of the trash site domains outright or is at least working together with them for profit over client's internet miseries is a little frightening.

Then there are the reputation company competitor flame wars on internet forums - which should say something about these businesses in and of itself.

People interested in addressing their online reputations should consider hiring a traditional public relations firm which will actually work in their best interests rather than attempting to game the system (which is what this company does, period). Given the most recent changes in Google's analytics, where quality - but more than that - REAL content is ever more emphasized, it makes much more sense not only monetarily, but as an approach that would actually work.